In a courtroom, what is the type of questioning that occurs after direct examination?

The type of questioning that occurs after direct examination is cross examination. During cross examination, the attorney for the opposing side has the opportunity to question the witness in order to challenge the testimony provided during direct examination. This process allows the opposing counsel to highlight inconsistencies, assess the reliability of the witness, and potentially sow doubt about the relevance or accuracy of the testimony presented.

The nature of cross examination is crucial in the courtroom as it serves to test the strength of the case and to scrutinize the credibility of witnesses. It is different from redirect examination, which follows cross examination and allows the original attorney to ask questions to clarify or rehabilitate the witness's testimony. Rebuttal questioning refers to a response to evidence presented by the opposing side, and closure questioning is not a standard legal term associated with testimony in court. Understanding the role of cross examination is vital for anyone involved in the legal process, as it is a fundamental aspect of ensuring a fair trial and judicial process.